Fiscal Austerity Measures : Spending Cuts vs . Tax Increases ∗ ( Preliminary and incomplete - Do not cite ! )

نویسندگان

  • Gerhard Glomm
  • Juergen Jung
  • Chung Tran
چکیده

Increasing fiscal deficits raise the possibility that many advanced economies will reach a state at which taxes and spending can no longer adjust to stabilize debt, which eventually leads governments to implement “unpleasant” fiscal austerity measures. In this paper, we study the macroeconomic and welfare effects of reducing government debt. We formulate a dynamic general equilibrium, overlapping generations economy model that includes intra cohort heterogeneity and a productive government sector as well as key government investment and entitlement programs. Preliminary results indicate that: First, in the small open economy model calibrated to Greece, we find that a spending-based austerity reform dominates the tax-based reform with respect to growth effects but not with respect to welfare effects. Meanwhile, a mixed reform that combines tax adjustments and cuts in public pensions results in the largest effects on GDP growth, around 2.5 percent. Second, the analysis of transition dynamics indicates trade-offs between long-run and short-run efficiency. The welfare effects differ significantly across generations along the transition to the post reform equilibrium. Third, accessibility to international capital markets and risk premiums strongly influence the effects of fiscal austerity measures. The largest output and welfare effects are observed when risk premiums are included or when access to international capital markets is restricted. We would like to thank George Georgiou for helpful comments. All remaining errors are ours. The authors acknowledge support from the Towson University Research Fellowship Program and from an ANU Internal Research Grant. Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington, e-mail: [email protected] Towson University, Department of Economics, Stephens Hall Room 101K, 8000 York Road, Towson MD 21252-0001, phone: (812)-345-9182, e-mail: [email protected] Research School of Economics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, tel: +61 2 6125 5638, email: [email protected] JEL Classification: E21, E63, H55, J26, J45

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fiscal Austerity Measures: Spending Cuts vs. Tax Increases

We formulate an overlapping generations model with skill heterogeneity and productive and non-productive government programs to study the macroeconomic and intergenerational welfare effects caused by risk premium shocks and government debt reductions. We demonstrate that in a small open economy with a high level of debt-to-GDP ratio a small increase in the risk premium leads to substantial outp...

متن کامل

What do we know about the effects of austerity?

This paper summarizes the results of a large recent literature on multi year fiscal plans for deficit reduction (austerity). The key results are that deficit reduction policies based upon spending cuts are much less costly in terms of short run output losses than tax based adjustments. . On average fiscal adjustment based upon spending cuts have very samll otput costs and in come cases they are...

متن کامل

Fiscal Policy and Financial Markets*

We examine the effect of fiscal policy on sovereign risk spreads and investigate whether the interaction of fiscal variables with political institutions affect financial markets. Using panel data from emerging market countries, we find that revenue-based adjustment lowers spreads more than spending-based adjustment. Financial markets also react to the composition of spending. Cuts in current sp...

متن کامل

Starve the Beast or Explode the Deficit? the Effects of Tax Cuts on Government Spending

The hypothesis that reductions in taxes reduce future government spending is often cited as a reason for cutting taxes. Despite its prominence in debates over fiscal policy, however, this view has been subject to little investigation. Because taxes change for many reasons, both legislated and unlegislated, examinations of the relationship between overall measures of taxation and subsequent spen...

متن کامل

Iowa Ag Review Winter 2005 , Vol . 11 No . 1

Republicans control both houses of Congress as well as the presidency. Control means accountability, and large federal budget deficits do not harmonize with the Republican self-image of fiscal prudence. Thus, one of the top agenda items this spring and summer will be how to reduce the federal budget deficit. President Bush and congressional leaders have ruled out tax increases. This leaves only...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012